Debate: Motion`s Material

Allowing woman to take part in combat

Text 1: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/24/women-combat-change-panetta/1861995/

Text 2: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100199981/the-pentagon-allows-women-to-fight-on-the-front-line-when-did-feminism-become-pro-war/

Text 3: http://news.discovery.com/human/psychology/women-military-front-120213.htm

1.- What is the main idea of each text?

Text 1: Expose the restrictions on women in the military.

Text 2: Present the fact that the pentagon announced that is expanding the number of combat roles open to woman in the US military.

Text 3: Publicize the news that  four female members of the military filed a lawsuit challenging the Pentagon's ban on women serving in combat. 

2.- Is the text against or in favor of your motion?

Text 1: In favor.

Text 2: Against.

Text 3: Against.

3.- Can you find elements to support the ideas presented? Where?

Text 1: This text it is very important to support my work because they present the restrictions of women in combat and my position in the debate don`t allow the woman to take part in combat.

Text 2: This text don`t have things that are in favor of my position in this work, because they speak about the new roles that are adopting woman in the US military.

Text 3: This text also don`t have things that are in favor of my position in this work. Probably just they serve to me to learn things about the arguments that can say the opposite house.

4.- How can you realize those elements are supporting sentences/arguments?

Text 1: Under the title they are a sentence that helps to understand the hole text and the argument that they are going to show for defend their ideas.

Text 2: In this text the picture is of extremely signification, because helps to situate readers in a context and understand better their ideas.

Text 3: Here, in the first paragraph their is a question that situate readers in position that helps for understand and know in a better way what the text is about.

5.- Do you think the text is a good source of information for your debate? Is it trustful? Why?

The three text analyzed they are good sources of information for my debate, because they are from recognized websites that constantly they are publishing news of extremely signification for the world.